Tool landscape

Revenue attribution tools, and what none of them can fix.

A tool applies a model to the data you have. If source is lost at conversion, the model is confident and wrong.

No sequence, no newsletter. One reply from a person.

Got it. You will hear from hello@sapwood.io.

What each one is for

HubSpot attributionIncluded at higher tiers, adequate for most single-CRM motions.Data quality is the limit
Campaign InfluenceNative, flexible and almost always under configured.Exhaust this first
DreamdataBuilt for B2B multi touch, strong at stitching anonymous to known.Needs clean inputs too
HockeyStackSimilar ground with a heavier analytics layer for teams who query rather than read.Steeper to learn
BizibleThe usual choice where Marketo is central.Tied to that stack
BI on your warehouseThe route when the model must be yours and auditable.Highest effort, no vendor to blame

Decide it with evidence instead of a demo

FreeRead-only, a written report with every gap priced, yours either way.
$2,000A month if you want it fixed. Up to 15 hours a week, Kaypo included.
No callYou can start from the pricing page without speaking to anyone.

Questions

Which attribution model should we use?

For most B2B motions with a buying committee, multi touch. The model matters far less than whether source survives conversion.

Do we need a dedicated attribution tool?

Often not. Native campaign influence in Salesforce or HubSpot is usually under configured rather than insufficient.

Why do marketing and sales report different numbers?

Usually a different date basis, a different filter, or one counting contacts while the other counts accounts.

Want to talk it through?

Leave an email and I will reply myself, usually the same day. No sequence, no newsletter, and no calendar link unless you ask for one.

One reply from a person. Nothing else.

Got it. You will hear from hello@sapwood.io.

Would rather just book time? Here is the calendar.